首页> 外文OA文献 >Adaptive expectations versus rational expectations: Evidence from the lab
【2h】

Adaptive expectations versus rational expectations: Evidence from the lab

机译:适应性预期与理性预期:来自实验室的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of the present work is to shed light on the extensive debate about expectations in financial markets. We analyze the behaviors of subjects in an experimental environment in which it is possible to observe expectations directly, since the sole task of each player is to predict the future price of an asset. We investigate the mechanism of expectation formation in two different contexts: first, where the fundamental value is constant; second, where the fundamental price increases over repetitions. First of all, we look at whether there is a convergence to the rational equilibrium even if agents have adaptive expectations, according to the main results of Palestrini and Gallegati (2015). Moreover, we concentrate on the accuracy of aggregate forecasts compared with individual forecasts. We find that there is collective rationality instead of individual rationality. In the context of an increasing fundamental value, contrary to theoretical predictions, players are able to capture the trend, but underestimate that value. This implies that there is no full convergence to the rational expectations equilibrium if all agents make their forecasts according to an adaptive scheme.
机译:本工作的目的是阐明有关金融市场预期的广泛辩论。我们分析实验对象在可直接观察期望的实验环境中的行为,因为每个参与者的唯一任务是预测资产的未来价格。我们在两种不同的情况下研究了期望形成的机制:首先,基本值恒定。第二,基本价格随重复价格而上涨。首先,根据Palestrini和Gallegati(2015)的主要结果,我们考察即使代理人具有适应性预期,理性均衡是否收敛。此外,我们将重点放在总预测与单个预测相比的准确性上。我们发现,存在集体理性而不是个人理性。与理论预测相反,在基本价值不断提高的情况下,参与者能够抓住趋势,但低估了该价值。这意味着,如果所有代理都根据自适应方案进行预测,则不会完全收敛于理性预期均衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号